PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIHX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMI Large Cap Fund (FMIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIHX achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIHX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.


FMIHX

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
0.78%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
8.95%

FZALX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.44%
YTD
10.54%
6M
12.47%
1Y
31.53%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMIHX
FMI Large Cap Fund
-1.65%6.21%10.17%21.03%-14.73%18.40%10.23%23.66%-4.10%19.25%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
10.54%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIHX and FZALX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FMIHX and FZALX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIHX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIHX
FMIHX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FMIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI Large Cap Fund (FMIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMIHXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.49

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

3.61

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

16.39

-15.93

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIHX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMIHXFZALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.71

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.99

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.92

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.86

-0.37

Drawdowns

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIHX drawdown since its inception was -47.80%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIHX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMIHXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.80%

-35.23%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-8.99%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.23%

-18.49%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.99%

-23.25%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.15%

-35.23%

+1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-0.32%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-3.78%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

1.98%

+2.70%

Volatility

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

FMI Large Cap Fund (FMIHX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) at 2.73%. This indicates that FMIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMIHXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.73%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

9.06%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

11.98%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.70%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

18.14%

-0.52%

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIHX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIHX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

FMIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.11%, more than FZALX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIHX
FMI Large Cap Fund
16.11%15.84%13.22%10.54%22.62%17.10%11.56%7.77%20.37%9.27%7.48%11.02%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.65%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIHX and FZALX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMIHX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FZALX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIHX dropped -47.80% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIHX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer