PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIEX vs. WAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIEX achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than WAEMX's 24.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIEX has outperformed WAEMX with an annualized return of 11.49%, while WAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.


FMIEX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.56%
YTD
13.17%
6M
15.54%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
11.49%

WAEMX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
24.12%
6M
28.17%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
13.17%30.93%8.66%5.67%-0.12%25.11%2.04%17.27%-5.67%11.21%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
24.12%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIEX and WAEMX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between FMIEX and WAEMX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIEX vs. WAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIEX
FMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMIEXWAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.36

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

4.49

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.24

13.90

+3.34

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the WAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIEX and WAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMIEXWAEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

2.03

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.11

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.47

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.30

+0.29

Drawdowns

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIEX drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, smaller than the maximum WAEMX drawdown of -66.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIEX and WAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMIEXWAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-66.35%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-7.89%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.52%

-25.56%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

-44.88%

+26.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-44.88%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-8.18%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-16.81%

+10.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.54%

-0.81%

Volatility

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) is 2.82%, while Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that FMIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMIEXWAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

5.82%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

14.64%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.30%

17.48%

-8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

17.73%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.19%

-2.47%

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WAEMX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIEX vs. WAEMX - Dividend Comparison

FMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than WAEMX's 56.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
5.05%5.76%9.02%3.27%8.54%4.34%1.74%3.82%18.46%16.45%5.16%11.75%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
56.72%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIEX and WAEMX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAEMX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to FMIEX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIEX dropped -49.85% vs WAEMX's -66.35%.

FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIEX and WAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer