PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHTX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHTX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FMHTX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return.


FMHTX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.13%
6M
-0.78%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
1.78%
ALL TIME*
4.35%

NMTRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.16%
6M
0.55%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
-0.20%5.34%1.98%6.00%-9.88%1.19%4.91%7.16%0.90%5.58%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
1.25%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHTX and NMTRX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.82

The correlation between FMHTX and NMTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHTX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMHTX
FMHTX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FMHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMHTXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.60

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

9.17

-3.43

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHTX and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHTX drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHTX and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHTXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-16.36%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.65%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.83%

-5.77%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.30%

-16.36%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.36%

-16.36%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-2.16%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.89%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.75%

+0.09%

Volatility

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) have volatilities of 0.90% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHTXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.92%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

2.42%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

3.03%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.75%

4.04%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

4.40%

-0.59%

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHTX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHTX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

FMHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than NMTRX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
2.72%3.74%2.74%2.41%1.66%2.22%2.39%2.80%2.95%3.09%3.86%2.86%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.31%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHTX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to FMHTX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHTX dropped -22.17% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHTX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer