PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHI vs. TAFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHI vs. TAFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than TAFM's 2.03% return.


FMHI

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.62%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.16%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*

TAFM

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHI vs. TAFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
2.92%3.54%5.41%2.04%
TAFM
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
2.03%4.21%2.54%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHI and TAFM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023

0.71

The correlation between FMHI and TAFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHI vs. TAFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHI
FMHI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TAFM
TAFM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TAFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAFM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TAFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAFM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHI vs. TAFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMHITAFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.45

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.56

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

9.09

+3.78

FMHI vs. TAFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the TAFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHI and TAFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMHI vs. TAFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than TAFM's maximum drawdown of -4.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and TAFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHITAFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-4.74%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-2.69%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.24%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-0.93%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.76%

-0.14%

Volatility

FMHI vs. TAFM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) at 0.73%. This indicates that FMHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHITAFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.73%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

2.05%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

3.07%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.77%

4.90%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

4.90%

+0.81%

FMHI vs. TAFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TAFM's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHI vs. TAFM - Dividend Comparison

FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than TAFM's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
4.23%4.16%4.01%3.89%3.57%2.87%3.13%3.33%3.46%0.30%
TAFM
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
3.63%3.51%3.35%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHI and TAFM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMHI has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to TAFM (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHI dropped -18.83% vs TAFM's -4.74%.

On 1-year performance, FMHI leads with 7.99% vs 6.85% for TAFM. On fees, TAFM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMHI has performed better with a 7.99% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAFM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FMHI.

FMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 3.63% for TAFM.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.28% for TAFM.

FMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHI and TAFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer