FMHI vs. OVM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FMHI (First Trust Municipal High Income ETF) and OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMHI returned 0.91%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for OVM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMHI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for OVM.

Performance

FMHI vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than OVM's 4.20% return.

FMHI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 8.49%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 0.91%
• 10Y*: —

OVM

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: 11.88%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 1.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHI vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF	2.68%	3.54%	5.41%	7.20%	-14.67%	7.58%	4.09%	1.09%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	4.20%	4.14%	3.42%	7.35%	-11.26%	4.22%	6.17%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHI and OVM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019	0.54

The correlation between FMHI and OVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMHI vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHI

FMHI Risk / Return Rank: 83
FMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

OVM

OVM Risk / Return Rank: 89
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHI vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMHI	OVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.87	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	4.26	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.59	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	4.89	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.66	19.04	-5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMHI vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the OVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHI and OVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMHI	OVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75	2.87	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.30	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.43	+0.13

Drawdowns

FMHI vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than OVM's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and OVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMHI	OVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.83%	-15.58%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.35%	-2.44%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-8.20%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.83%	-15.58%	-3.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-4.01%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	0.63%	-0.01%

Volatility

FMHI vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is 0.96%, while Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that FMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMHI	OVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	1.27%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.10%	3.37%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12%	4.16%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.76%	5.39%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.73%	6.54%	-0.81%

FMHI vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMHI vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than OVM's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF	4.24%	4.16%	4.01%	3.89%	3.57%	2.87%	3.13%	3.33%	3.46%	0.30%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	6.10%	5.45%	4.91%	4.66%	4.21%	6.10%	3.97%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMHI and OVM in my portfolio?

FMHI and OVM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMHI or OVM?

OVM has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to FMHI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHI dropped -18.83% vs OVM's -15.58%.

Which ETF is better, FMHI or OVM?

On 5-year performance, OVM leads with 1.63% vs 0.91% for FMHI. On fees, FMHI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FMHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMHI or OVM?

Over the 5-year period, OVM has performed better with a 1.63% return vs 0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMHI or OVM?

FMHI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMHI or OVM?

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 4.24% for FMHI.

What is the main difference between FMHI and OVM?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.82% for OVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.