FMHI vs. AMUN
FMHI (First Trust Municipal High Income ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMHI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
FMHI vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.13% return.
FMHI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMHI vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF | 2.68% | 0.46% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.13% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMHI and AMUN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMHI vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
FMHI
AMUN
FMHI vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMHI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMHI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 2.07 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
FMHI vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMHI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -0.61% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -0.09% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility
FMHI vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMHI | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12% | 1.00% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 1.00% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 1.00% | +4.73% |
FMHI vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMHI vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than AMUN's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.89% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF | 4.24% | 4.16% | 4.01% | 3.89% | 3.57% | 2.87% | 3.13% | 3.33% | 3.46% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMHI and AMUN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FMHI.
FMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for FMHI and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer