PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMFIX vs. LCCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBB Free Market Fixed Income Fund (FMFIX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMFIX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FMFIX has underperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 1.27%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.


FMFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.05%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
1.27%

LCCMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.89%
6M
6.59%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMFIX
RBB Free Market Fixed Income Fund
1.00%4.88%0.71%5.43%-6.52%-1.06%3.28%4.78%0.65%1.05%
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
3.89%9.73%18.51%13.73%-13.30%1.30%7.52%0.65%2.35%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FMFIX and LCCMX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.14

The correlation between FMFIX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMFIX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMFIX
FMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LCCMX
LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBB Free Market Fixed Income Fund (FMFIX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMFIXLCCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.01

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.96

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

10.42

+2.19

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMFIX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMFIXLCCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.46

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.06

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.67

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.81

-0.19

Drawdowns

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMFIX and LCCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMFIXLCCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-24.57%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

-3.76%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.72%

-3.76%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

-19.20%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.35%

-24.57%

+15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-2.80%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

1.06%

-0.77%

Volatility

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBB Free Market Fixed Income Fund (FMFIX) is 0.60%, while Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that FMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMFIXLCCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.68%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.23%

4.06%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61%

4.53%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

5.84%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

6.35%

-3.92%

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMFIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMFIX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

FMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMFIX
RBB Free Market Fixed Income Fund
3.64%3.49%0.71%2.75%1.35%0.37%1.22%1.44%2.45%1.25%0.58%0.39%
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
8.53%8.93%10.39%8.55%5.68%2.11%2.11%2.98%2.89%2.10%2.01%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMFIX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCCMX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to FMFIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMFIX dropped -9.35% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMFIX and LCCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer