PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FME.DE vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FME.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FME.DE is traded in EUR, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FME.DE achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 12.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FME.DE has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of -4.55%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


FME.DE

1D
4.78%
1M
13.04%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-2.12%
1Y
-21.22%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
-4.55%

ISAC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.12%
YTD
12.99%
6M
13.49%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FME.DE
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
-3.71%-5.10%19.75%27.41%-45.19%-14.52%6.88%18.41%-34.69%10.35%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.81%7.84%25.58%18.90%-13.09%27.74%6.13%28.61%-5.49%9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FME.DE and ISAC.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2011

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between FME.DE and ISAC.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FME.DE
FME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FME.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FME.DEISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.40

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

4.19

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

16.02

-17.16

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FME.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FME.DE and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FME.DEISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

2.16

-2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.84

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.78

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.82

-0.69

Drawdowns

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FME.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.63%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FME.DE and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FME.DEISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.63%

-33.27%

-46.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.27%

-6.37%

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.77%

-20.27%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.09%

-20.27%

-41.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.61%

-33.27%

-35.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.04%

-0.40%

-48.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.56%

-4.42%

-18.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.23%

1.67%

+16.56%

Volatility

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FME.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that FME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FME.DEISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

3.47%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

9.30%

+12.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.53%

12.39%

+15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.08%

14.81%

+16.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

15.83%

+12.31%

Dividends

FME.DE vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

FME.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FME.DE
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
3.95%3.53%2.69%2.95%4.42%2.35%3.52%1.77%1.87%1.09%0.99%1.00%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FME.DE and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FME.DE and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer