FMDGX vs. MMGPX
FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FMDGX returned 5.63%/yr vs -7.25%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMDGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDGX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.33% return.
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.82% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | -6.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDGX and MMGPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FMDGX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDGX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
FMDGX
MMGPX
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMDGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | -0.20 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | -0.40 | +1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.59% | -75.38% | +36.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -27.79% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -29.27% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.59% | -72.70% | +34.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -41.64% | +39.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.14% | -30.29% | +19.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 13.62% | -8.53% |
Volatility
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) is 5.70%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that FMDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 9.77% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 21.75% | -8.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 28.61% | -11.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 39.83% | -17.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 35.22% | -10.92% |
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FMDGX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.79% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMDGX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to FMDGX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDGX dropped -38.59% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDGX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer