FMDGX vs. BQMGX
FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) and BQMGX (Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FMDGX returned 6.73%/yr vs 2.93%/yr for BQMGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMDGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BQMGX.
Performance
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDGX achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly higher than BQMGX's -3.06% return.
FMDGX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BQMGX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- -2.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.79% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.06% | -0.29% | 14.16% | 13.00% | -19.44% | 23.02% | 19.62% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDGX and BQMGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FMDGX and BQMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDGX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank
FMDGX
BQMGX
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDGX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.97 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.28 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | -0.66 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDGX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | -0.27 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.50 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, which is greater than BQMGX's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and BQMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDGX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.59% | -36.05% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -11.62% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -18.72% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.59% | -25.92% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -8.96% | +6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -5.87% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 4.90% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 3.38%. This indicates that FMDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDGX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.38% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 9.13% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 12.19% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 16.83% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 17.98% | +6.34% |
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BQMGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMDGX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison
FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than BQMGX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | 4.25% | 4.12% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 5.90% | 8.05% | 5.27% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.07% | 5.80% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.79% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMDGX and BQMGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDGX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to BQMGX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDGX dropped -38.59% vs BQMGX's -36.05%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDGX and BQMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer