PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCCX vs. TLVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCCX achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than TLVAX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCCX has outperformed TLVAX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while TLVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


FMCCX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.61%
YTD
18.74%
6M
18.65%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
12.01%

TLVAX

1D
1.37%
1M
0.81%
YTD
9.03%
6M
7.41%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I
18.74%10.42%9.18%17.17%-13.93%23.21%13.04%29.58%-7.63%19.57%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
9.03%4.80%23.59%13.21%-11.70%26.86%13.07%26.39%-8.93%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCCX and TLVAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1999

0.86

The correlation between FMCCX and TLVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCCX vs. TLVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCCX
FMCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FMCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TLVAX
TLVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TLVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCCXTLVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

1.72

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

5.10

+9.02

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the TLVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCCX and TLVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCCXTLVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.11

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.63

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Drawdowns

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCCX drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than TLVAX's maximum drawdown of -55.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCCX and TLVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCCXTLVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-55.23%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-7.46%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-14.96%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-20.69%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.38%

-37.34%

-6.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.92%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-8.23%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.51%

-0.19%

Volatility

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX) at 3.19%. This indicates that FMCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCCXTLVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

3.19%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

8.73%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

11.53%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

16.09%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

17.34%

+3.66%

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCCX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than TLVAX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCCX vs. TLVAX - Dividend Comparison

FMCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than TLVAX's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I
6.81%8.08%0.00%0.76%9.69%12.82%2.30%4.14%20.89%4.12%0.97%1.81%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
8.41%9.16%20.11%0.86%5.52%4.35%3.39%11.83%10.96%6.78%1.25%12.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCCX and TLVAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCCX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to TLVAX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCCX dropped -64.90% vs TLVAX's -55.23%.

FMCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCCX and TLVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer