FMCCX vs. IWP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP).
FMCCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 20, 1996. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001.
Performance
FMCCX vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMCCX vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I | 4.19% | 10.42% | 9.18% | 17.17% | -13.93% | 23.21% | 13.04% | 29.58% | -7.63% | 19.57% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.91% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMCCX achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCCX has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 10.80%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.
FMCCX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
IWP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMCCX vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMCCX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMCCX vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank
FMCCX
IWP
FMCCX vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMCCX | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.39 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 0.73 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.68 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 2.10 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMCCX | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.39 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.22 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.53 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.41 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMCCX and IWP is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMCCX vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
FMCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than IWP's 0.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCCX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I | 7.76% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 9.69% | 12.82% | 2.30% | 4.14% | 20.89% | 4.12% | 0.97% | 1.81% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
FMCCX vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMCCX drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than IWP's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCCX and IWP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMCCX | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.90% | -56.92% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -14.79% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -38.62% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.38% | -38.62% | -4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.86% | -11.22% | +5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -9.71% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 4.76% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FMCCX vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMCCX | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 7.02% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 13.18% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.38% | 23.08% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 22.34% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 21.63% | -0.68% |