PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCCX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCCX achieves a 17.38% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCCX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.88%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FMCCX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.84%
YTD
17.38%
6M
18.48%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
11.88%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I
17.38%10.42%9.18%17.17%-13.93%23.21%13.04%29.58%-7.63%19.57%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCCX and FCNTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FMCCX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCCX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCCX
FMCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FMCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.72

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

2.39

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.13

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.16

9.04

+4.12

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCCX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.72

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.79

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.89

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Drawdowns

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCCX drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCCX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCCXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-49.19%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-11.30%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-19.75%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-32.59%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.38%

-32.59%

-10.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-8.16%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.65%

-0.33%

Volatility

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I (FMCCX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FMCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCCXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.26%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

10.48%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

14.03%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

19.15%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

19.68%

+1.31%

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCCX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCCX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FMCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FMCCX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class I
6.88%8.08%0.00%0.76%9.69%12.82%2.30%4.14%20.89%4.12%0.97%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCCX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCCX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCCX dropped -64.90% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FMCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCCX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer