PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMBPX vs. FGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMBPX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than FGSAX's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FMBPX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


FMBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.21%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.46%

FGSAX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.76%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.62%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
0.81%9.03%1.04%4.44%-12.21%-1.35%4.77%6.30%1.13%2.76%
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.66%10.54%32.97%27.05%-24.60%22.39%35.50%27.95%-3.23%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FMBPX and FGSAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

-0.05

The correlation between FMBPX and FGSAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMBPX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMBPX
FMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FGSAX
FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMBPXFGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.40

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

1.11

+7.23

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the FGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMBPX and FGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMBPXFGSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

0.32

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.49

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.68

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.48

-0.22

Drawdowns

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMBPX drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMBPX and FGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMBPXFGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-66.17%

+47.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-13.73%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.69%

-24.51%

+16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-35.79%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.34%

-37.19%

+18.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-3.06%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-16.15%

+12.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

4.90%

-3.98%

Volatility

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) is 1.63%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FMBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMBPXFGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

3.54%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

13.72%

-10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

16.85%

-12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

22.41%

-15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

22.32%

-17.20%

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMBPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMBPX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison

FMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than FGSAX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.84%4.92%4.32%0.00%2.31%25.75%7.07%8.13%14.46%13.93%0.89%25.34%
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
5.02%4.87%4.29%3.46%2.29%1.96%2.68%3.23%3.14%2.83%2.72%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMBPX and FGSAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGSAX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FMBPX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMBPX dropped -18.34% vs FGSAX's -66.17%.

FMBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMBPX and FGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer