FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF) and HFG.TO (Hamilton Global Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from Hamilton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMAX.TO returned 6.01% vs 17.90% for HFG.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAX.TO achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than HFG.TO's 7.82% return.

FMAX.TO

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: -0.60%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HFG.TO

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 4.91%
• 6M: 6.75%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: 24.59%
• 5Y*: 15.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF	0.89%	7.70%	33.11%
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF	7.82%	22.93%	30.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAX.TO and HFG.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.50

The correlation between FMAX.TO and HFG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAX.TO

FMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 16
FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

HFG.TO

HFG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 50
HFG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HFG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HFG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HFG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
HFG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) and Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMAX.TO	HFG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.38	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.03	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.27	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	1.64	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.91	5.19	-4.28

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the HFG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAX.TO and HFG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum HFG.TO drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAX.TO and HFG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAX.TO	HFG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.84%	-42.71%	+24.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.83%	-10.95%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-0.79%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-5.37%	+1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	3.46%	+3.17%

Volatility

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (FMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO) at 3.65%. This indicates that FMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAX.TO	HFG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	3.65%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.87%	10.72%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	13.05%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	16.04%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	20.25%	-4.25%

Dividends

FMAX.TO vs. HFG.TO - Dividend Comparison

FMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, more than HFG.TO's 2.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Financials Yield Maximizer ETF	11.77%	11.03%	9.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF	2.40%	2.55%	3.05%	3.86%	10.09%	4.16%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAX.TO and HFG.TO in my portfolio?

FMAX.TO and HFG.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.