FMAR vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FMAR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). FMAR is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAR returned 10.43%/yr vs 23.52%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

FMAR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMAR having a 9.35% return and YCS slightly higher at 9.63%.

FMAR

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 23.52%
• 10Y*: 13.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	9.35%	9.69%	14.61%	20.39%	-5.51%	11.71%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	9.63%	9.04%	35.41%	28.70%	29.09%	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAR and YCS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021	-0.01

The correlation between FMAR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FMAR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 63
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMAR	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.43	1.86	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.44	2.36	+3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.84	1.34	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.46	3.78	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	46.64	11.93	+34.71

FMAR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMAR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAR drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAR and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAR	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-49.56%	+35.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.36%	-8.30%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.37%	-23.05%	+10.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.36%	-27.32%	+12.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.14%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-19.87%	+17.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	2.65%	-2.27%

Volatility

FMAR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) is 1.76%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that FMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAR	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	2.25%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.27%	12.19%	-7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.16%	16.93%	-11.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.47%	21.10%	-10.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.32%	18.82%	-8.50%

FMAR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMAR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAR nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAR and YCS in my portfolio?

FMAR and YCS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMAR or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to FMAR (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAR dropped -14.36% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, FMAR or YCS?

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.52% vs 10.43% for FMAR. On fees, FMAR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMAR or YCS?

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.52% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAR or YCS?

FMAR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAR or YCS?

FMAR and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FMAR and YCS?

FMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAR and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.