PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYW vs. AFRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLYW vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYW achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than AFRM's -11.10% return.


FLYW

1D
-0.47%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
3.88%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
-23.28%
5Y*
-13.54%
10Y*

AFRM

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.16%
YTD
-11.10%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
52.28%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYW vs. AFRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
3.88%-31.33%-10.93%-5.39%-35.71%11.94%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
-11.10%22.22%23.93%408.17%-90.38%86.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYW and AFRM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.49

The correlation between FLYW and AFRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLYW:

$1.88B

AFRM:

$23.03B

EPS

FLYW:

$99.12

AFRM:

$1.10

PE Ratio

FLYW:

0.15

AFRM:

60.05

PS Ratio

FLYW:

0.01

AFRM:

7.18

PB Ratio

FLYW:

0.00

AFRM:

6.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLYW:

$188.60B

AFRM:

$3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLYW:

$299.78M

AFRM:

$2.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLYW:

$11.02B

AFRM:

$908.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLYW vs. AFRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYW
FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRM
AFRM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AFRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFRM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFRM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYW vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLYWAFRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

0.16

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

0.31

+3.08

FLYW vs. AFRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYW Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYW and AFRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLYW vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYW drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, smaller than the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYW and AFRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYWAFRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.40%

-94.71%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.16%

-53.86%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.98%

-55.85%

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.40%

-94.71%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.74%

-60.73%

-12.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-68.65%

+12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.75%

27.04%

-16.29%

Volatility

FLYW vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is 13.08%, while Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a volatility of 17.80%. This indicates that FLYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLYWAFRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.08%

17.80%

-4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.78%

43.83%

-7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.88%

60.85%

-13.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.22%

96.23%

-39.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.28%

95.46%

-38.18%

Dividends

FLYW vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYW nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FLYW vs. AFRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flywire Corporation and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
188.11B
268.03M
(FLYW) Total Revenue
(AFRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLYW vs. AFRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flywire Corporation and Affirm Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
FLYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AFRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported an operating income of 10.78B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

AFRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

FLYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a net income of 12.52B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

AFRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLYW and AFRM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFRM has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to FLYW (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYW dropped -84.40% vs AFRM's -94.71%.

FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLYW and AFRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer