FLYU vs. SOXL
FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FLYU tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYU returned 10.52%/yr vs 133.82%/yr for SOXL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
FLYU vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 525.03% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- -20.70%
- 6M
- -12.97%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -6.36%
- 1M
- 82.23%
- YTD
- 525.03%
- 6M
- 481.71%
- 1Y
- 1,280.87%
- 3Y*
- 133.82%
- 5Y*
- 46.78%
- 10Y*
- 64.43%
FLYU vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -20.70% | -2.29% | 33.00% | 111.16% | -17.79% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 525.03% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -31.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and SOXL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FLYU and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLYU vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLYU
SOXL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLYU
SOXL
-
Industrials
FLYU
SOXL
-
Technology
FLYU
SOXL
Communication Services
FLYU
SOXL
-
Real Estate
FLYU
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Energy
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
FLYU
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
SOXL
FLYU vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.69 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 29.80 | -29.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 102.14 | -102.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 12.69 | -12.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.51 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -90.46% | +21.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | -43.47% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.00% | -87.88% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.10% | -6.36% | -30.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.48% | -35.01% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.60% | 12.66% | +11.94% |
Volatility
FLYU vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) is 24.39%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 41.05%. This indicates that FLYU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.39% | 41.05% | -16.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.28% | 81.57% | -24.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.74% | 102.16% | -28.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.12% | 107.25% | -24.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.12% | 99.05% | -15.93% |
FLYU vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYU vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYU and SOXL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (41.05%) compared to FLYU (24.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 3-year performance, SOXL leads with 133.82% vs 10.52% for FLYU. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FLYU has been the lower-risk option at 24.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 133.82% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYU.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.
FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYU and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer