FLYU vs. FEPI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while FEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. FLYU is passively managed, while FEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, FLYU returned -16.46% vs 14.82% for FEPI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.

Performance

FLYU vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -13.15% return, which is significantly lower than FEPI's 2.79% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -4.58%
• 6M: -15.18%
• YTD: -13.15%
• 1Y: -16.46%
• 3Y*: 1.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEPI

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: -3.44%
• 6M: 3.19%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-13.15%	-2.29%	33.00%	43.77%
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	2.79%	18.33%	15.69%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and FEPI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.53

The correlation between FLYU and FEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLYU vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLYU	FEPI
Consumer Cyclical	52.6%	13.6%
Industrials	17.7%	-
Technology	16.4%	66.7%
Communication Services	13.2%	19.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 27
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYU	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	0.81	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	1.19	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.15	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	1.15	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	3.35	-3.99

FLYU vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYU Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYU and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and FEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	FEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-23.56%	-45.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	-12.91%	-39.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.11%	-8.27%	-22.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.57%	-3.62%	-22.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.76%	4.43%	+21.33%

Volatility

FLYU vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 7.04%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	FEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.87%	7.04%	+11.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.15%	14.71%	+46.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.43%	18.41%	+56.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.97%	19.36%	+63.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.97%	19.36%	+63.61%

FLYU vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLYU vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	27.15%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYU and FEPI in my portfolio?

FLYU and FEPI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYU or FEPI?

FLYU has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to FEPI (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

Which ETF is better, FLYU or FEPI?

On 1-year performance, FEPI leads with 14.82% vs -16.46% for FLYU. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYU or FEPI?

Over the 1-year period, FEPI has performed better with a 14.82% return vs -16.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYU or FEPI?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYU or FEPI?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 27.15%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.

What is the main difference between FLYU and FEPI?

FLYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FEPI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.65% for FEPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.