FLYU vs. DBO
FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYU returned 10.52%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for DBO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
FLYU vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- -20.70%
- 6M
- -12.97%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
FLYU vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -20.70% | -2.29% | 33.00% | 111.16% | -17.79% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | -17.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and DBO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between FLYU and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLYU vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLYU
DBO
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLYU
DBO
-
Industrials
FLYU
DBO
-
Technology
FLYU
DBO
-
Communication Services
FLYU
DBO
-
Real Estate
FLYU
DBO
-
Basic Materials
FLYU
-
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
FLYU
-
DBO
-
Energy
FLYU
-
DBO
-
Financial Services
FLYU
-
DBO
Healthcare
FLYU
-
DBO
-
Utilities
FLYU
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
DBO
FLYU vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 4.28 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 8.69 | -8.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.25 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.02 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -90.18% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | -18.19% | -34.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.00% | -28.20% | -40.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.10% | -52.68% | +15.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.48% | -62.25% | +35.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.60% | 8.94% | +15.66% |
Volatility
FLYU vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 24.39% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 12.79%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.39% | 12.79% | +11.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.28% | 28.32% | +28.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.74% | 34.58% | +39.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.12% | 32.31% | +50.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.12% | 31.79% | +51.33% |
FLYU vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYU vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYU and DBO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYU has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to DBO (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 20.83% vs 10.52% for FLYU. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBO has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 20.83% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYU.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.
FLYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYU and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer