PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYU vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLYU vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


FLYU

1D
-2.10%
1M
-9.79%
6M
-1.73%
YTD
-14.35%
1Y
-4.05%
3Y*
0.98%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.94%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$41.17K$39.32K$61.70K

FLYU vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLYU
MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs
-14.35%-2.29%33.00%111.16%-19.09%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%-20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and DBO is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FLYU and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLYU vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLYU
FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLYU vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLYUDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.25

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.01

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

6.09

-6.50

FLYU vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYU Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYU and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYUDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.00%

-90.18%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.33%

-27.73%

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.00%

-28.20%

-40.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.06%

-53.56%

+21.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-62.20%

+35.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.23%

9.96%

+16.27%

Volatility

FLYU vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 21.04% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 17.75%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLYUDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.04%

17.75%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.81%

33.77%

+28.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.03%

38.53%

+37.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.98%

33.35%

+49.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.98%

32.20%

+50.78%

FLYU vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLYU vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
FLYU
MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLYU and DBO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLYU has higher volatility (21.04%) compared to DBO (17.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.86% vs 0.98% for FLYU. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBO has been the lower-risk option at 17.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYU.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.

FLYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLYU and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer