PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXR vs. VMSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLXR having a 1.28% return and VMSAX slightly lower at 1.24%.


FLXR

1D
0.13%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.48%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VMSAX

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.46%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
1.28%8.37%4.42%
VMSAX
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Fund Admiral Shares
1.24%9.08%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXR and VMSAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.68

The correlation between FLXR and VMSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXR vs. VMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXR
FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VMSAX
VMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXRVMSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.10

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

0.12

+3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.58

1.85

+13.74

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXR Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the VMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXR and VMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXR drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum VMSAX drawdown of -54.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXR and VMSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXRVMSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-54.84%

+52.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-54.84%

+53.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.22%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-3.06%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

3.49%

-3.15%

Volatility

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VMSAX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FLXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXRVMSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.76%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

2.05%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

133.59%

-131.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.81%

63.90%

-61.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.81%

63.90%

-61.09%

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VMSAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXR vs. VMSAX - Dividend Comparison

FLXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than VMSAX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.81%5.66%3.44%0.00%0.00%
VMSAX
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Fund Admiral Shares
5.54%5.66%6.48%5.52%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXR and VMSAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXR has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to VMSAX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXR dropped -1.94% vs VMSAX's -54.84%.

FLXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXR and VMSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer