FLXN vs. SCYB

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FLXN is actively managed, while SCYB is passively managed. Over the past year, FLXN returned 8.51% vs 6.15% for SCYB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

FLXN vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 2.07% return.

FLXN

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 2.73%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 1Y: 8.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 1.61%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXN vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	3.25%	4.71%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	2.07%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and SCYB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025	0.90

The correlation between FLXN and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLXN vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXN

FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 65
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXN vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLXN	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.65	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.47	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.53	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.39	11.31	+1.09

FLXN vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXN and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLXN	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-4.92%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-2.44%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.27%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-0.50%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.55%	+0.14%

Volatility

FLXN vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 0.81%. This indicates that FLXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLXN	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	0.81%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.96%	3.00%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.00%	3.76%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	5.08%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.99%	5.08%	-0.09%

FLXN vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXN vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than SCYB's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	8.40%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.93%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLXN and SCYB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FLXN and SCYB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLXN or SCYB?

FLXN has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to SCYB (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXN dropped -3.39% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

Which ETF is better, FLXN or SCYB?

On 1-year performance, FLXN leads with 8.51% vs 6.15% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLXN or SCYB?

Over the 1-year period, FLXN has performed better with a 8.51% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLXN or SCYB?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLXN or SCYB?

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 6.93% for SCYB.

What is the main difference between FLXN and SCYB?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.03% for SCYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.