FLXN vs. SCYB
FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FLXN is actively managed, while SCYB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
FLXN vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.76% return.
FLXN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXN vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 2.50% | 4.71% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.76% | 3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXN and SCYB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXN vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
FLXN
SCYB
FLXN vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXN | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.70 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
FLXN vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXN | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -4.92% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.12% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -0.52% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
FLXN vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXN | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 3.75% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 5.13% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 5.13% | -0.09% |
FLXN vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXN vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than SCYB's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 7.49% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FLXN and SCYB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.
FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 6.92% for SCYB.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.03% for SCYB.
Find the right allocation for FLXN and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer