FLXN vs. FLRT

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLXN returned 8.51% vs 5.29% for FLRT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

FLXN vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.12% return.

FLXN

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 2.73%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 1Y: 8.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRT

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.85%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 4.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXN vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	3.25%	4.71%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	2.12%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and FLRT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

FLXN vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXN

FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 87
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXN vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLXN	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	3.61	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	5.42	-2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.82	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.99	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.39	10.97	+1.43

FLXN vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXN and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLXN	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-20.96%	+17.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-1.78%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	0.00%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-1.40%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.48%	+0.21%

Volatility

FLXN vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.30%. This indicates that FLXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLXN	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	0.30%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.96%	1.22%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.00%	1.47%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	2.30%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.99%	6.12%	-1.13%

FLXN vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXN vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than FLRT's 6.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.75%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	8.40%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLXN and FLRT in my portfolio?

FLXN and FLRT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLXN or FLRT?

FLXN has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FLRT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXN dropped -3.39% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which ETF is better, FLXN or FLRT?

On 1-year performance, FLXN leads with 8.51% vs 5.29% for FLRT. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLXN or FLRT?

Over the 1-year period, FLXN has performed better with a 8.51% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLXN or FLRT?

FLRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLXN or FLRT?

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 6.75% for FLRT.

What is the main difference between FLXN and FLRT?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.69% for FLRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.