FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE
FLXK.DE (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) and XCS3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXK.DE is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while XCS3.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXK.DE returned 16.82%/yr vs 6.89%/yr for XCS3.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXK.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCS3.DE.
Performance
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 83.61% return, which is significantly higher than XCS3.DE's 7.13% return.
FLXK.DE
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -16.98%
- 6M
- 62.26%
- YTD
- 83.61%
- 1Y
- 149.33%
- 3Y*
- 39.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS3.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 83.61% | 73.19% | -17.07% | 16.75% | -23.45% | 0.14% | 34.15% | 1.72% |
XCS3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 7.13% | 3.11% | 26.75% | -7.60% | 1.23% | -1.02% | -6.99% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXK.DE and XCS3.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXK.DE
XCS3.DE
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXK.DE | XCS3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.29 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 3.04 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.57 | 8.22 | +12.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, smaller than the maximum XCS3.DE drawdown of -43.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and XCS3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXK.DE | XCS3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -43.32% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.34% | -7.85% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.99% | -21.83% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.31% | -21.83% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.34% | -3.55% | -18.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -17.42% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 2.91% | +4.32% |
Volatility
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 19.63% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) at 3.83%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCS3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXK.DE | XCS3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.63% | 3.83% | +15.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.44% | 10.87% | +28.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.67% | 14.00% | +29.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.25% | 13.14% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 15.01% | +13.16% |
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS3.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXK.DE nor XCS3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXK.DE and XCS3.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCS3.DE.
FLXK.DE is categorized as South Korea Equities, while XCS3.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. FLXK.DE tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while XCS3.DE tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLXK.DE and 0.50% for XCS3.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXK.DE and XCS3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer