FLXK.DE vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
FLXK.DE and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXK.DE is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both FLXK.DE and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.38% | 73.17% | -17.06% | 16.74% | -23.45% | 0.14% | 34.15% | 14.19% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 0.60% | 11.47% | 18.10% | -16.34% | -21.96% | 11.28% | 29.87% | 15.95% |
Different Trading Currencies
FLXK.DE is traded in EUR, while CNYA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNYA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 33.38% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 0.60% return.
FLXK.DE
- 1D
- 8.83%
- 1M
- -11.17%
- YTD
- 33.38%
- 6M
- 63.43%
- 1Y
- 122.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
FLXK.DE
CNYA
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.80 | 0.89 | +2.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.19 | 1.32 | +2.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.18 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 1.34 | +4.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 4.34 | +18.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80 | 0.89 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.05 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.23 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXK.DE and CNYA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
FLXK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.93% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, smaller than the maximum CNYA drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and CNYA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -49.49% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.92% | -11.47% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -45.11% | +5.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -21.52% | +7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.84% | -20.77% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 2.67% | +2.77% |
Volatility
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 5.04%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.65% | 5.04% | +11.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.95% | 11.80% | +16.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 19.01% | +13.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 22.85% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 23.33% | +2.24% |