FLXK.DE vs. CNYA
FLXK.DE (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXK.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while CNYA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXK.DE returned 20.42%/yr vs -0.13%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXK.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.
Performance
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXK.DE is traded in EUR, while CNYA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNYA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 113.07% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 10.61% return.
FLXK.DE
- 1D
- -5.45%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 113.07%
- 6M
- 130.94%
- 1Y
- 225.04%
- 3Y*
- 46.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 34.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 113.07% | 73.17% | -17.06% | 16.74% | -23.45% | 0.14% | 34.15% | 14.19% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 10.15% | 11.47% | 18.10% | -16.34% | -21.96% | 11.28% | 29.87% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXK.DE and CNYA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
FLXK.DE
CNYA
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.37 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.68 | 5.17 | +5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.63 | 13.57 | +25.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.91 | 2.07 | +3.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.01 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.27 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, smaller than the maximum CNYA drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -43.64% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.92% | -6.74% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.99% | -32.98% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -42.08% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -10.20% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -16.18% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 2.56% | +3.24% |
Volatility
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 5.95%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXK.DE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.58% | 5.95% | +11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.23% | 11.62% | +21.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.87% | 16.84% | +21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 22.95% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 23.27% | +3.48% |
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXK.DE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
FLXK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXK.DE and CNYA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.
FLXK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CNYA is China Equities. FLXK.DE tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLXK.DE and 0.60% for CNYA.
Find the right allocation for FLXK.DE and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer