FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE).
FLXK.DE and IS3N.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXK.DE is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both FLXK.DE and IS3N.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXK.DE Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.38% | 73.17% | -17.06% | 16.74% | -23.45% | 0.14% | 34.15% | 14.19% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.98% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 14.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 33.38% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 5.98% return.
FLXK.DE
- 1D
- 8.83%
- 1M
- -11.17%
- YTD
- 33.38%
- 6M
- 63.43%
- 1Y
- 122.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 24.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXK.DE
IS3N.DE
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.80 | 1.37 | +2.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.19 | 1.86 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.26 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 2.37 | +3.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 8.26 | +14.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80 | 1.37 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.36 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXK.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXK.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -35.06% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.92% | -13.67% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -22.01% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -7.44% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.84% | -9.41% | -6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 3.07% | +2.37% |
Volatility
FLXK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.46%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLXK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.65% | 7.46% | +9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.95% | 12.71% | +15.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 18.00% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 15.71% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 17.88% | +7.69% |