PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXK.DE vs. IBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXK.DE is traded in EUR, while IBOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBOT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 113.07% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 23.66% return.


FLXK.DE

1D
-5.45%
1M
13.51%
YTD
113.07%
6M
125.49%
1Y
216.17%
3Y*
46.07%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*

IBOT

1D
-4.52%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
23.66%
6M
22.14%
1Y
47.36%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLXK.DE
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
113.07%73.17%-17.06%13.63%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
23.66%13.31%13.42%17.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXK.DE and IBOT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2023

0.46

The correlation between FLXK.DE and IBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXK.DE
FLXK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXK.DEIBOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.38

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.68

3.35

+7.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.63

13.19

+25.44

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.91, which is higher than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXK.DE and IBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXK.DEIBOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.91

2.22

+3.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.00

-0.16

Drawdowns

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -26.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and IBOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXK.DEIBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.43%

-26.60%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.92%

-14.22%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.99%

-26.60%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-4.52%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-4.89%

-10.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

3.60%

+2.20%

Volatility

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 7.44%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXK.DEIBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.58%

7.44%

+10.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.23%

17.01%

+16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.87%

21.47%

+16.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

22.02%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.75%

22.02%

+4.73%

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXK.DE vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

FLXK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FLXK.DE
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.31%0.38%2.81%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXK.DE and IBOT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBOT.

FLXK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IBOT is Technology Equities. FLXK.DE tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLXK.DE and 0.47% for IBOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXK.DE and IBOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer