FLXI vs. XMMO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

FLXI (Invesco Flexible Income ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Invesco, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. FLXI is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

FLXI vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Flexible Income ETF (FLXI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLXI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMMO

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 23.28%
• 6M: 22.12%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 19.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXI vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLXI Invesco Flexible Income ETF	8,673.64%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	20.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXI and XMMO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

FLXI vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXI vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Flexible Income ETF (FLXI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLXI	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.53	—

Drawdowns

FLXI vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXI drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLXI	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-55.37%	+51.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-2.12%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-9.43%	+8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLXI	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13,903.83%	20.09%	+13,883.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13,903.83%	21.69%	+13,882.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13,903.83%	22.30%	+13,881.53%

FLXI vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXI vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FLXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLXI Invesco Flexible Income ETF	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.57%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLXI and XMMO in my portfolio?

FLXI and XMMO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLXI or XMMO?

On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLXI or XMMO?

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLXI or XMMO?

FLXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.57% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between FLXI and XMMO?

FLXI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLXI and 0.35% for XMMO.