PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXI.DE achieves a -9.32% return, which is significantly lower than IBC6.DE's 10.86% return.


FLXI.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-9.32%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
-11.71%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*

IBC6.DE

1D
-0.63%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
10.86%
6M
12.44%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLXI.DE
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-9.32%-8.72%16.97%17.26%-1.79%35.49%1.89%1.19%
IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF
10.86%1.01%8.47%10.05%-0.95%18.21%-1.41%5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXI.DE and IBC6.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXI.DE
FLXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IBC6.DE
IBC6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXI.DEIBC6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.16

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.61

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

4.12

-5.56

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXI.DE and IBC6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXI.DEIBC6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

0.89

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.32

+0.01

Drawdowns

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum IBC6.DE drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.DE and IBC6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXI.DEIBC6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-43.64%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-7.49%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-23.12%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.76%

-23.12%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.26%

-2.69%

-18.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-7.84%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

2.92%

+5.16%

Volatility

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that FLXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBC6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXI.DEIBC6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.71%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

10.68%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

13.47%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.70%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

19.31%

+0.65%

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBC6.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXI.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXI.DE nor IBC6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXI.DE and IBC6.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.

FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.DE and 0.50% for IBC6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXI.DE and IBC6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer