IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE).
IBC6.DE and OP6E.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBC6.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. OP6E.DE is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap. It was launched on Jun 30, 2022. Both IBC6.DE and OP6E.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 8.19% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -5.69% |
OP6E.DE Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) | 4.16% | 6.39% | 15.17% | 0.41% | -5.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than OP6E.DE's 4.16% return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
OP6E.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OP6E.DE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
OP6E.DE
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.85 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.43 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 7.50 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.85 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.37 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and OP6E.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor OP6E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than OP6E.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and OP6E.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -18.34% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -10.46% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -4.73% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -4.93% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.18% | +0.55% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) at 4.32%. This indicates that IBC6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OP6E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | OP6E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 4.32% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 8.56% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 15.25% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 14.81% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 14.81% | +4.55% |