FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE
FLXI.DE (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLXI.DE tracks the FTSE India 30/18 Capped while ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLXI.DE returned 3.83%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ESGP.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXI.DE achieves a -9.32% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.DE's 6.87% return.
FLXI.DE
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -11.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI.DE Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -9.32% | -8.72% | 16.97% | 17.26% | -1.79% | 7.23% |
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 6.87% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI.DE
ESGP.DE
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXI.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.18 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.83 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 5.36 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXI.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 1.02 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.39 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -20.50% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -6.31% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -20.50% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.26% | -2.57% | -18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -5.31% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 2.16% | +5.92% |
Volatility
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that FLXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 3.24% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 8.68% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 11.29% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 14.54% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 14.54% | +5.42% |
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXI.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXI.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXI.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer