PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLXE.L (Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF) and ISDE.L (iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FLXE.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while ISDE.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXE.L returned 7.79%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for ISDE.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXE.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ISDE.L.

Performance

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXE.L is traded in GBP, while ISDE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXE.L achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than ISDE.L's 60.76% return.

FLXE.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
0.27%
YTD
15.59%
6M
14.91%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
—

ISDE.L

1D
-2.79%
1M
14.45%
YTD
60.76%
6M
63.75%
1Y
109.18%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF		15.59%18.87%8.11%6.48%-9.68%8.46%-1.63%7.98%-6.24%1.90%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		60.71%30.46%-1.86%8.28%-13.53%3.61%18.62%14.85%-12.37%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXE.L and ISDE.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.75

The correlation between FLXE.L and ISDE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLXE.L
ISDE.L

Financial Services

21.1%
3.7%

Technology

11.9%
48.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.8%
3.3%

Energy

11.7%
10.1%

Industrials

9.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

8.7%
0.9%

Basic Materials

7.5%
12.2%

Utilities

3.3%
2.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

FLXE.L
21.1%
ISDE.L
3.7%

Technology

FLXE.L
11.9%
ISDE.L
48.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLXE.L
11.8%
ISDE.L
3.3%

Energy

FLXE.L
11.7%
ISDE.L
10.1%

Industrials

FLXE.L
9.8%
ISDE.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXE.L
9.5%
ISDE.L
5.3%

Communication Services

FLXE.L
8.7%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Basic Materials

FLXE.L
7.5%
ISDE.L
12.2%

Utilities

FLXE.L
3.3%
ISDE.L
2.3%

Healthcare

FLXE.L
2.5%
ISDE.L
4.8%

Real Estate

FLXE.L
2.5%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with FLXE.L:
FLXE.L vs. EXXW.DEFLXE.L vs. MFEMFLXE.L vs. EMIM.LFLXE.L vs. FRIN.LFLXE.L vs. IS3N.DEFLXE.L vs. AVEMFLXE.L vs. JPGL.L
Often compared with ISDE.L:
ISDE.L vs. VFEG.LISDE.L vs. JRDM.LISDE.L vs. VDEM.LISDE.L vs. LEML.LISDE.L vs. EDG2.LISDE.L vs. PRAM.LISDE.L vs. EMVL.L

Return for Risk

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLXE.L
FLXE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FLXE.LISDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.63
4.61

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.73
5.26

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.79

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

8.63

-5.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

31.10

-18.94

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXE.L and ISDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FLXE.LISDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

4.61

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.79

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.72

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.36

-0.01

Drawdowns

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum ISDE.L drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.L and ISDE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLXE.LISDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-46.71%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-12.58%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.93%

-21.66%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-21.66%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.22%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-3.34%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-14.03%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.50%

-0.75%

Volatility

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) is 4.62%, while iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that FLXE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLXE.LISDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

11.38%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

20.94%

-10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

23.54%

-10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

17.76%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.28%

-3.83%

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDE.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXE.L vs. ISDE.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.08%1.86%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLXE.L and ISDE.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

FLXE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLXE.L and 0.85% for ISDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXE.L and ISDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer