FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L
FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXD.L returned 12.45%/yr vs 20.57%/yr for CMB1.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.
Performance
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXD.L is traded in GBP, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.95% return.
FLXD.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CMB1.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 29.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.17%
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.05% | 30.47% | 7.67% | 8.27% | 5.37% | 9.65% | 1.13% | 17.43% | -7.79% | -11.45% |
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 16.95% | 43.83% | 13.25% | 30.68% | -3.56% | 18.29% | 1.52% | 24.83% | -13.79% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXD.L and CMB1.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FLXD.L and CMB1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Communication Services
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Healthcare
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Energy
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Industrials
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Basic Materials
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Real Estate
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Consumer Defensive
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Technology
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Utilities
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXD.L
CMB1.L
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXD.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 3.67 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.11 | 13.44 | +1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.29%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and CMB1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXD.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -56.05% | +25.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.68% | -10.32% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.80% | -15.62% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.31% | -24.19% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -2.87% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -15.21% | +9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.83% | -1.45% |
Volatility
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.36%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXD.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 4.06% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 12.41% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.65% | 15.11% | -6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 18.01% | -7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 20.12% | -6.97% |
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.99% | 4.20% | 4.36% | 4.96% | 5.02% | 4.72% | 3.57% | 4.56% | 5.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXD.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.
FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and CMB1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer