FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE
FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLXC.DE returned 4.76% vs 26.83% for CHIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.DE achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 6.22% return.
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -7.36% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 6.22% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FLXC.DE and CHIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.DE
CHIN.DE
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 3.02 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 8.15 | -7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.57 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.64 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -22.95% | -32.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -8.84% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -3.48% | -27.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -7.69% | -20.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 3.29% | +4.09% |
Volatility
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) at 6.18%. This indicates that FLXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 6.18% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 12.00% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 17.09% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 22.41% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 22.41% | +3.79% |
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXC.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXC.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXC.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXC.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXC.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer