FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE
FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) and 9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both China Equities funds - FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped while 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLXC.DE returned 7.94%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for 9W1A.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for 9W1A.DE.
Performance
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXC.DE is traded in EUR, while 9W1A.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 9W1A.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.DE achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly higher than 9W1A.DE's -7.09% return.
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -8.48%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -2.45% |
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.09% | 16.00% | 22.66% | -16.84% | -23.09% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.DE and 9W1A.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FLXC.DE and 9W1A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.DE
9W1A.DE
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.14 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 0.29 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.12 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.11 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than 9W1A.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.DE and 9W1A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -50.46% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -16.74% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -27.29% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -25.28% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -27.20% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 8.13% | -0.75% |
Volatility
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) is 6.78%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that FLXC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9W1A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 7.43% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 14.13% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 19.82% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 29.40% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 29.40% | -3.20% |
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than 9W1A.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXC.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXC.DE nor 9W1A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FLXC.DE and 9W1A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXC.DE and 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXC.DE and 9W1A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer