PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLV vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


FLV

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.00%
YTD
5.79%
6M
6.27%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
5.79%15.80%11.51%6.23%0.94%17.30%39.27%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%57.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FLV and VTI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.72

The correlation between FLV and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLV
VTI

Financial Services

23.1%
12.0%

Healthcare

15.6%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

13.5%
4.7%

Industrials

11.7%
9.8%

Technology

11.0%
33.5%

Energy

9.6%
3.7%

Utilities

5.4%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
10.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

FLV
23.1%
VTI
12.0%

Healthcare

FLV
15.6%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLV
13.5%
VTI
4.7%

Industrials

FLV
11.7%
VTI
9.8%

Technology

FLV
11.0%
VTI
33.5%

Energy

FLV
9.6%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

FLV
5.4%
VTI
2.3%

Communication Services

FLV
3.6%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLV
3.4%
VTI
10.0%

Basic Materials

FLV
3.1%
VTI
2.0%

Real Estate

FLV
1.8%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLV
FLV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLVVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.17

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

14.62

-6.75

FLV vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLV and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLVVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.33

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.73

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.51

+0.56

Drawdowns

FLV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-55.45%

+40.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.92%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

-19.30%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-25.36%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-0.72%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-8.03%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.93%

+0.47%

Volatility

FLV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 2.45%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLVVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.96%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

9.13%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

12.17%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

17.40%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.30%

-4.05%

FLV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
1.67%1.90%2.07%2.07%4.98%4.05%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLV and VTI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FLV (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 8.47% for FLV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.

FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLV and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer