FLV vs. KWIN
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FLV is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
FLV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.72% return.
FLV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 10.18% | 4.87% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.72% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and KWIN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLV vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -1.50% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.32% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -0.26% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility
FLV vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 4.15% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 4.15% | +8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 4.15% | +10.09% |
FLV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for FLV and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer