PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLV vs. FDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLV vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLV vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
1.47%15.80%11.51%6.23%0.94%17.30%39.27%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
-10.09%22.13%45.89%37.22%-35.74%8.52%93.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's -10.09% return.


FLV

1D
1.22%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
1.47%
6M
4.88%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

FDG

1D
4.35%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-10.09%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLV vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLV vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLV
FLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLV vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLVFDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.08

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.67

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.58

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.42

5.57

-1.15

FLV vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLV and FDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLVFDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.08

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.36

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.80

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FLV and FDG is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLV vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
1.74%1.90%2.07%2.07%4.98%4.05%0.87%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

FLV vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and FDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVFDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-43.69%

+28.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-15.71%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-43.69%

+28.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-12.04%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-13.75%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

4.45%

-1.65%

Volatility

FLV vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 3.51%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLVFDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

7.98%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

14.04%

-6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

23.85%

-10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

24.68%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.37%

25.05%

-10.68%