FLV vs. ACGR
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while ACGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. FLV is actively managed, while ACGR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 8.47%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for ACGR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.
Performance
FLV vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than ACGR's 7.39% return.
FLV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FLV vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 5.79% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 39.27% |
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.39% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and ACGR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between FLV and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
ACGR
FLV vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLV | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 1.53 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 5.20 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLV | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.57 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.70 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.70 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
FLV vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and ACGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -34.54% | +19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -15.84% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -24.58% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -34.54% | +19.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -1.68% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -8.50% | +5.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 4.66% | -2.26% |
Volatility
FLV vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 2.45%, while American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 3.65% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 11.95% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 15.49% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 21.51% | -8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 21.42% | -7.17% |
FLV vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than ACGR's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% |
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and ACGR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to FLV (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs ACGR's -34.54%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 15.06% vs 8.47% for FLV. On fees, ACGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.
FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.
FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ACGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.39% for ACGR.
FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and ACGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer