FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLUS.TO (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF) and CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FLUS.TO is passively managed, while CAUS.TO is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLUS.TO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CAUS.TO.

Performance

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLUS.TO

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 23.14%
• 5Y*: 16.75%
• 10Y*: —

CAUS.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	10.56%
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUS.TO and CAUS.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUS.TO

FLUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FLUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FLUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FLUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLUS.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLUS.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	2.61	-1.66

Drawdowns

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than CAUS.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUS.TO and CAUS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUS.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.25%	-6.25%	-22.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-1.68%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLUS.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	15.54%	-2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	15.54%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.84%	15.54%	+0.30%

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUS.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CAUS.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLUS.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Dividend Comparison

FLUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CAUS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	0.62%	0.73%	0.91%	1.20%	1.72%	1.74%	1.62%	1.83%	1.66%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUS.TO and CAUS.TO in my portfolio?

FLUS.TO and CAUS.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLUS.TO or CAUS.TO?

On fees, CAUS.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLUS.TO or CAUS.TO?

CAUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLUS.TO.

What is the main difference between FLUS.TO and CAUS.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLUS.TO and 0.19% for CAUS.TO.