PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLUR.NEO having a 13.65% return and TPE.TO slightly lower at 13.27%.


FLUR.NEO

1D
0.41%
1M
1.16%
6M
8.40%
YTD
13.65%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*

TPE.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
1.06%
6M
8.12%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLUR.NEO
Franklin International Equity Index ETF
13.65%25.68%12.42%12.87%-10.40%14.74%9.77%14.40%
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
13.27%25.30%12.36%15.65%-9.18%10.41%6.19%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2019

0.66

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUR.NEO
FLUR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TPE.TO
TPE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUR.NEOTPE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.31

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

8.72

+0.20

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUR.NEO drawdown since its inception was -30.20%, which is greater than TPE.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUR.NEOTPE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.20%

-27.42%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-11.35%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

-14.41%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-24.81%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.77%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.37%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.00%

-0.05%

Volatility

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) have volatilities of 3.04% and 3.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUR.NEOTPE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.13%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

13.21%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

15.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

14.11%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

14.68%

+2.26%

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUR.NEO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than TPE.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLUR.NEO vs. TPE.TO - Dividend Comparison

FLUR.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than TPE.TO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLUR.NEO
Franklin International Equity Index ETF
1.76%2.40%2.76%2.71%2.95%1.85%1.97%3.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
2.11%2.30%2.37%2.66%2.89%2.41%2.42%2.60%2.93%2.35%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for FLUR.NEO.

FLUR.NEO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TPE.TO is International Equity. FLUR.NEO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index-NR, while TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for FLUR.NEO and 0.19% for TPE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUR.NEO and TPE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer