PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLUR.NEO is traded in CAD, while LVHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUR.NEO achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 17.00% return.


FLUR.NEO

1D
0.49%
1M
2.12%
YTD
13.01%
6M
12.76%
1Y
26.23%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.53%
1M
2.60%
YTD
17.00%
6M
17.36%
1Y
37.74%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLUR.NEO
Franklin International Equity Index ETF
13.01%25.68%12.42%12.87%-10.40%14.74%9.77%14.40%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
17.00%21.32%24.53%14.66%10.42%18.13%-10.92%9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and LVHI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2019

0.43

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUR.NEO
FLUR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUR.NEOLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.66

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

6.70

-4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

22.97

-13.99

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUR.NEO and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUR.NEO drawdown since its inception was -30.20%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHI drawdown of -29.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUR.NEO and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUR.NEOLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.20%

-29.52%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-5.66%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

-12.48%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-12.48%

-14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

0.00%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.51%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.65%

+1.29%

Volatility

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.97%. This indicates that FLUR.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUR.NEOLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

2.97%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

8.49%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

10.45%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

12.84%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

15.33%

+1.64%

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUR.NEO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUR.NEO vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FLUR.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than LVHI's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLUR.NEO
Franklin International Equity Index ETF
1.77%2.40%2.76%2.71%2.95%1.85%1.97%3.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.74%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUR.NEO and LVHI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLUR.NEO is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLUR.NEO is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

FLUR.NEO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLUR.NEO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index-NR, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for FLUR.NEO and 0.40% for LVHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUR.NEO and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer