FLUD vs. JSI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI).

FLUD and JSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLUD is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 14, 2020. JSI is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Nov 8, 2023.

Performance

FLUD vs. JSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLUD vs. JSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	0.68%	5.36%	5.44%	1.09%
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF	0.41%	6.46%	7.27%	3.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than JSI's 0.41% return.

FLUD

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: —

JSI

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUD vs. JSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JSI's 0.50% expense ratio.

JSI

Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF

FLUD

Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF

Return for Risk

FLUD vs. JSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUD

FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 98

JSI

JSI Risk / Return Rank: 83
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUD vs. JSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLUD	JSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.64	+0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	2.21	+1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.34	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.63	2.09	+8.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	39.41	8.60	+30.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLUD vs. JSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the JSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUD and JSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLUD	JSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.64	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.54	2.54	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FLUD and JSI is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLUD vs. JSI - Dividend Comparison

FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than JSI's 6.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.48%	4.51%	4.97%	4.72%	1.39%	0.92%	0.93%
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF	6.27%	5.80%	6.16%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLUD vs. JSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum JSI drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and JSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUD	JSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-2.31%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.44%	-2.31%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-1.02%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-0.33%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	0.56%	-0.44%

Volatility

FLUD vs. JSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) is 0.38%, while Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that FLUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUD	JSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	0.93%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.12%	1.48%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74%	2.92%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	2.93%	-1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.27%	2.93%	-1.66%