PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTW vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 76.74% return, which is significantly higher than INCM's 6.53% return.


FLTW

1D
4.37%
1M
17.38%
YTD
76.74%
6M
81.82%
1Y
120.79%
3Y*
42.79%
5Y*
22.83%
10Y*

INCM

1D
0.55%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6.53%
6M
6.91%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTW vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
76.74%32.00%16.68%9.62%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
6.53%13.07%6.80%5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and INCM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTW vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTWINCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.53

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.76

4.77

+5.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.32

19.92

+12.39

FLTW vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and INCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-7.84%

-30.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-3.19%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-7.84%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.68%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-1.08%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

0.76%

+2.86%

Volatility

FLTW vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 2.36%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTWINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.76%

2.36%

+12.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

4.21%

+20.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.46%

5.51%

+22.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.06%

7.28%

+15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

7.28%

+14.83%

FLTW vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTW vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
1.35%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.08%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTW and INCM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (14.76%) compared to INCM (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs INCM's -7.84%.

On 3-year performance, FLTW leads with 42.79% vs 10.54% for INCM. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 42.79% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 1.35% for FLTW.

FLTW is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INCM is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLTW and 0.38% for INCM.

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTW and INCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer