PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTKX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLTKX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.49%
6M
9.03%
YTD
11.92%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
11.34%

LTTIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
11.92%21.87%16.05%19.58%-17.27%17.56%16.18%22.67%-7.16%17.32%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTKX and LTTIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between FLTKX and LTTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTKX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTKX
FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTKXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTKXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

Volatility

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTKXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTKX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLTKX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FLTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
5.28%5.86%2.70%2.31%4.02%19.28%2.35%2.08%3.98%0.54%1.87%0.00%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTKX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTKX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer