FLTB vs. FDVV
FLTB (Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. FLTB is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLTB returned 2.26%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
FLTB vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.92% return.
FLTB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTB vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 0.84% | 6.60% | 5.14% | 5.94% | -5.88% | -1.20% | 5.57% | 5.87% | 1.06% | 2.10% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.92% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTB and FDVV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.09 |
The correlation between FLTB and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLTB vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLTB
FDVV
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FLTB
FDVV
Financial Services
FLTB
FDVV
Basic Materials
FLTB
-
FDVV
-
Communication Services
FLTB
-
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
FLTB
-
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
FLTB
-
FDVV
Energy
FLTB
-
FDVV
-
Healthcare
FLTB
-
FDVV
Industrials
FLTB
-
FDVV
Real Estate
FLTB
-
FDVV
Utilities
FLTB
-
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTB vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
FLTB
FDVV
FLTB vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.66 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 11.05 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.46 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.92 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FLTB vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -40.25% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | -9.30% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.52% | -15.90% | +14.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.26% | -20.18% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.63% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -3.81% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 2.23% | -1.87% |
Volatility
FLTB vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.62%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 3.12% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 8.00% | -6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13% | 10.04% | -7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.80% | 14.75% | -11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 17.00% | -14.06% |
FLTB vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLTB vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.31% | 4.11% | 3.20% | 1.63% | 0.89% | 1.56% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTB and FDVV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FLTB (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.47% vs 2.26% for FLTB. On fees, FLTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 2.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.
FLTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTB and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer