PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 2.47%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.


FLTB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.47%

DBO

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
79.84%
6M
74.51%
1Y
77.38%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
0.84%6.60%5.14%5.94%-5.88%-1.20%5.57%5.87%1.06%2.10%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
79.84%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FLTB and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

FLTB vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTB
DBO

Technology

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
116.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FLTB
0.0%
DBO

-

Financial Services

FLTB
0.0%
DBO
116.0%

Basic Materials

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Energy

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Industrials

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Utilities

FLTB

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
FLTB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.28

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

8.69

+3.54

FLTB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTBDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.25

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.48

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.34

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.02

+0.82

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-90.18%

+80.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-18.19%

+16.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

-28.20%

+26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

-37.68%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.37%

-61.69%

+52.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-52.68%

+52.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-62.25%

+60.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

8.94%

-8.58%

Volatility

FLTB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.62%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

12.79%

-12.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

28.32%

-26.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

34.58%

-32.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

32.31%

-29.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

31.79%

-28.85%

FLTB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than DBO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.95%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.36%4.31%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTB and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to FLTB (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 10.89% vs 2.47% for FLTB. On fees, FLTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.95% for DBO.

FLTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer