FLSW vs. VXUS
FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSW returned 6.92%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for VXUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLSW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
FLSW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.69% return.
FLSW
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
FLSW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 4.68% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.69% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSW and VXUS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FLSW and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLSW vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLSW
VXUS
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
FLSW
VXUS
Financial Services
FLSW
VXUS
Industrials
FLSW
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
FLSW
VXUS
Basic Materials
FLSW
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
FLSW
VXUS
Technology
FLSW
VXUS
Real Estate
FLSW
VXUS
Communication Services
FLSW
VXUS
Utilities
FLSW
VXUS
Energy
FLSW
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
FLSW
VXUS
FLSW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLSW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 2.53 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 9.72 | -6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLSW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -35.97% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -11.27% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -13.58% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -29.44% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.47% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -8.21% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.93% | +1.28% |
Volatility
FLSW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is 4.97%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that FLSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 6.71% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 14.02% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 16.09% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.21% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 17.20% | -0.30% |
FLSW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLSW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than VXUS's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.02% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.67% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to FLSW (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.32% vs 6.92% for FLSW. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLSW.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.02% for FLSW.
FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSW and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer