FLSW vs. PBEU
FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while PBEU is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLSW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
FLSW vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 13.63% return.
FLSW
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLSW vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 4.52% | 6.49% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 13.63% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSW and PBEU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSW vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
FLSW
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLSW vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLSW | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLSW vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSW | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -17.26% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -1.42% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.94% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility
FLSW vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSW | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 27.63% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 27.63% | -11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 27.63% | -10.75% |
FLSW vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLSW vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 0.12% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSW and PBEU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBEU.
FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while PBEU is Financials Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for FLSW and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer