PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSW vs. PBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSW vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 13.63% return.


FLSW

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
4.52%
6M
3.79%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

PBEU

1D
-1.42%
1M
7.22%
YTD
13.63%
6M
14.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and PBEU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSW vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PBEU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSWPBEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

FLSW vs. PBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and PBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSWPBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-17.26%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-1.42%

-2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.94%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

Volatility

FLSW vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSWPBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

27.63%

-11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

27.63%

-11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

27.63%

-10.75%

FLSW vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSW vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
0.12%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%
PBEU
Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSW and PBEU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBEU.

FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.

FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while PBEU is Financials Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.13% for PBEU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSW and PBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer