PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSPX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSPX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's 0.80% return.


FLSPX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.47%
YTD
11.48%
6M
12.41%
1Y
29.66%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
10.90%

QAMNX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.66%
YTD
0.80%
6M
3.26%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
11.48%16.15%27.96%14.00%-11.49%4.40%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
0.80%10.00%17.33%4.71%9.19%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSPX and QAMNX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSPX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSPX
FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSPXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

0.76

+1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

1.19

+2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.16

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.07

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.16

2.47

+12.69

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSPX and QAMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSPXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

0.76

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Drawdowns

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSPX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSPX and QAMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-17.97%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-4.16%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-4.16%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.24%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-5.15%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.80%

+0.22%

Volatility

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 2.03%. This indicates that FLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.03%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

5.02%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

6.61%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

13.86%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

13.86%

-0.23%

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSPX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSPX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

FLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than QAMNX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
4.06%4.32%17.39%8.41%2.81%5.55%0.09%0.96%1.26%6.78%2.52%1.55%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.52%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSPX and QAMNX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSPX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to QAMNX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSPX dropped -27.07% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.

FLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSPX and QAMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer